Feature Story Wednesday,
March 5, 2014
Our Canada: Q & A with Stťphane Dion
Canadian dollar to the Department of Fisheries & Oceans, to an inquiry on
missing Aboriginal women
Liberal MP Stephane Dion, seen as one of
Canada's greatest political thinkers of our time,
looks west to BC's future from Soprema's green roof last Friday.
Maurice Dion, PC, MP is a Canadian politician who has been the Member of
Parliament for the riding of Saint-LaurentĖCartierville in Montreal since
1996. Last Friday, the Voice had a chance to sit down with him for a
one-on-one in a local constituency meeting room at Soprema on Yale Rd.
How important is a senate to Canada, and do you support reforms in
the Upper Chamber rather than abolishing it?
The Fathers of Confederation wanted a sober, second thought chamber
to scrutinize what the House of Commons was doing and to suggest
improvements, amendments, ways to save money for taxpayers and ways to
clarify the bills.
If you look at the history of the country, they have done quite a
good job at that. Before Mr. Harper came, about 1-out-of-10 Bills
were amended by the senate. This doesnít take into account the fact
that senators were, at the outset, involved in the decision-making
process. They were able to suggest to MPís ways to improve their
work before the Bill was going to the senate.
So, thatís the role I want to protect, and what we Liberals want to
protect ó the role of having a chamber of scrutiny. Look at any
mistakes the House may do, because senators who have more
experience, they stay longer. The turnover is very rapid in the
House because of the elections.
Senators bring experience, and they will have time to look at that
because they donít have the work of the constituency, or the
partisan work to do. Itís what we want to preserve and to enhance in
asking senators to be part of a partisan caucus, to not have to be
linked to party discipline, to not have to raise money for a party,
to focus on the legislative work.
Concrete examples, only one letís say, a couple of years ago, the
House sent an omnibus (Bill C-45) to the senate. Senators took the
time to reflect carefully, and one (Liberal) senator, saw that in
the corner of a page, the Bill was giving to the Minister of
Heritage the power to exercise a lot of censorship on movies.
When he saw that, he highlighted the problem. Then the movie
industry woke up and said ďWhat is it? We donít want it, is
everybody were out of their minds?Ē
So the senate amended the Bill and brought it back to the House and
we said Ďthank you senators, we didnít see that', and we accepted
This is the kind of thing that in a country like Canada it would be
very helpful to protect instead of abolish.
What Mr. Trudeau is proposing, to ask senators to focus on this
legislative role to not be involved in raising any money like Mr.
Duffy was doing and all this kind of stuff, will be helpful for the
You need unanimity of provinces. There is no unanimity on it. The
NDP are asking for something that is not realistic with electing the
senate, making the senate elected.
We need to be careful about two things; the first thing is do we
want to elect the chambers, paralyzing each other, because today, if
the senators are not elected they would give the last word on Bills
to the House and they donít have the legitimacy of a legislated
mandate, MPís have.
Senators know it and they will propose amendments to the House, but
it will really happen that they will say to the House, ĎNevermind,
partisan, weíll impose a decision and weíll give the last word to
If senators are elected, theyíre elected with a mandate and will see
no reason any more to give the last word to the House. So they will
contradict the House and paralyze the democratic process.
Do you know a country where it is happening? The United States. What
is happening in the United States always? The White House and the
two chambers of the Congress are fighting each other and theyíre
paralyzing the country, and the world.
In the last three years, they were unable to come up with a budget.
Do we want that in Canada? Of course not.
If we have two elected chambers, we need to figure out the disputes
and the mechanics between the two and this does not exist in our
We need to amend the constitution a dispute resolution mechanism
between the House of Commons and the Senate if we have two elected
But here is an additional problem that I want to point out to the
people of British Columbia; is that en elected senate as I just
described would be powerful. Instead of contradicting the House once
every two to five years, they would do that once every 2 weeks.
This powerful senate then will highlight the problem that we have;
that this senate is not well balanced regarding the number of
senators by province.
Do you know how many senators that you have in British Columbia?
Youíve got six.
How many senators have you got in New Brunswick? Ten.
So, thereís not fair representation?
No, because the senateís history is all because of the fact that
Europeans came from the east to the west.
So at the time of confederation, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick
had 10 senators each made sense because they were numerous. But
today, each of these provinces is less numerous than British
So today, that British Columbia only has 6 senators and New
Brunswick 10 is tolerable only because the senate is a useful but
If the senate plays this full role because they are elected, Alberta
and British Columbia are short-changed with 6 senators and it
doesnít make sense and will say ĎGive us more senatorsí and then you
have a constitutional crisis because I donít know which province
will give these two (each).
Are you going to try and get more senators for BC?
No, because you need to re-open the constitution. I donít think the
province of Quebec is ready to discuss just this issue. They will
come with their own issues and then we are back to Meech in
What we need to do is to improve the senate without re-opening the
constitution. The best way to do it is the Justin Trudeau way; ask
the senate to be less partisan, to focus as its role as a sober
second thought chamber, a chamber of scrutiny, and to not put us in
a situation where a powerful senate would be terribly unfair of the
two most western provinces of our country to have only 6 senators.
Mr. Trudeauís position does not include a request to re-open the
constitution. It requests nothing more than a Bill in parliament
where we say senators should not be part of caucuses, and that
senators should focus on their role as chambers of scrutiny.
Senators need to improve the work of the house.
If we re-open the constitution in order to get more senators to one
region than another, itís very likely that each region will say;
Ďwhy must I sacrifice my share?í
Letís say you are an authentic Canadian. Authentic Canadians will
say ĎWell okay, Alberta and British Columbia are more powerful in
the House of Commons because their demography is growing. A share of
MPs is decreasing for authentic Canadians. So why accept or see our
share decreasing in the senate?
They will resist that. Quebec will resist that. Quebecers will say
we are a nation, and we should have half of the senators. Ontario is
already very under-represented in the senate. Toronto. Many in
Manitoba and Saskatewan and places up north have no senators. So it
will be very difficult to solve as a problem.
The solution to me, is to avoid the powerful senate, it would be too
unfair for Alberta and British Columbia and improve the senate of
scrutiny which we have today in a role, but a helpful role.
But what I want to say is; Mr. Harper is hurting his own province
and British Columbia. Heís willing to elect the senate without
correcting the under-representations of senators in the senate.
Thatís terrible what heís doing.
Ask (Mark Strahl) why he wants to short-change British Columbia with
the senate reform? Ask him why he wants to hurt his province this
To me, the Senate Reform Bill is maybe the most dangerous bill to
have in the House today.
Hopefully, the second supreme court will stop them because the
second court is Ö.
To elect the senate you have to have seven provinces representing,
50 per cent of the population.
The dollar has lost 10 per cent of its value over the last few
months, what do you think needs to be done to stop the nose dive and
try to get parity with the US dollar? If elected, how do you kick
start the economy? Is deficit spending the answer to promoting
We have very few ways that we can influence it. I will come and go
on the fact that the Canadian economy is not as strong as it should
be. The unemployment rate now is higher in Canada than in the US.
The economics of Mr. Harper and Mr. Flaherty is pretty
disappointing. We have a growth of -1.5 per cent and it was lower
than a year before. Weíre not going on the right direction.
They made a lot of mistakes. They put us in deficit before the
recession started. Before. We need to keep that in mind.
Today, Canadian households are more in debt than the US ones. The
economic record is pretty disappointing and I think itís time for a
What about stimulus spending, will it fuel the deficit?
Stimulus spending was needed. Do you remember we needed a monetary
crisis in order to convince the government to do that? And it was
not well thought out, it was not a very good stimulus spending
program and they spent a lot of money on advertising instead of on
programs ó even on programs that did not exist.
Itís incredible, but they advertised a program to get people
training that was still in negotiations with provinces and then
there is no agreement and even a year before itís not sure. So they
should have done better with their stimulus package.
The DFO here on the Coast, or at least in Chilliwack, is somewhat
of a dirty word. Somewhere around 18-20 Cohen Commission
recommendation deadlines have come and gone without any being
implemented, if the report's recommendations aren't being taken
seriously, then has the $26 million spent on it been a complete
waste of taxpayer money?
Itís not a waste of money because the report still exists. What has
been a waste of money are all the cuts they imposed to DFO and they
kept its own science (secret).
Science is examining, looking at what the Cohen Report is saying.
The DFO does not have the same capacity that they did in the past,
so many cuts have been imposed and scientists have been muzzled.
Scientists need freedom in order to be effective. So they dismantled
a lot of the scientific capacity of the federal government; DFO,
Statistics Canada, and so on, and the result is that people are
starting to lose confidence in the DFOís capacity to address the
problems of the fisheries.
But I would not blame the science of the report. It's a fact that
they donít have the support from the government like they should.
The Federal Liberal Party would do things differently?
We would use fact-based data, scientific-based data.
So there would be no muzzling of scientists?
No, to the contrary. We will need them more than ever. Today in this
community, people are concerned about clean air, clean water, the
facility thatís to burn the waste in Vancouver, and what kind of
pollution that means. Even the mayor, they did not have the right
information, they didnít know where to find it. Nobody spoke to
them. Itís not acceptable.
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) should not be
dismantled. It should be a powerful body as is the Environmental
Protection Agency in the United States.
I have nothing against the Canadian Energy Board, but they donít
have the same expertise as the CEAA.
So thatís one of the reasons why there canít be growth in Canada
when you donít have the scientific capacity to make the development
Farmed salmon is a contentious issue here on the West Coast,
would a Liberal government get rid of the net pens?
We will not act with emotion on this. Itís very serious to protect
the wildlife and the fishery and to allow the extent of fish
farming. We will have to look at that fairly carefully and we need
to assess it in the Cohen Report.
Does the Liberal Party support the Keystone and Enbridge
We support Keystone. But that is for the Americans to decide. We
think it makes sense. But weíll never blame Nebraska to ensure if
their watersheds and aquifers will be safe because they donít have a
lot of fresh water in this region
But, we said to the Americans if the environmental assessments are
positive, then 'letís go'. We are supporting it. Why are we
supporting it? Because, itís economic development and if not by
pipeline, then by trucks and trains and by barges. And those methods
are not as safe as a pipeline.
The music industry has taken quite a hit with digital streaming.
Is enough being done to help prop it up?
Thatís quite true. They lost 20 per cent in the last four years. Iím
not sure. Thatís why as a member of the Heritage House Committee, I
have requested that we conduct a study on the music industry of
Canada with the new challenges, with the new technologies and will
start next week.
Musicians are in trouble and we need to see if the help they receive
from the federal government needs to be adapted.
So this $25 million Canadian Music Fund is not enough?
Maybe itís enough. Maybe itís a way we allocate the money. Maybe
itís the kind of regulations that we have to see how we may help the
industry to adapt to technologies.
They have a lot of difficulties now to earn enough money and you
also have the matter of property rights and we think that in the
coming weeks the committee ó which I am a member of ó who will focus
on this issue.
Doctor-assisted suicide was one of the 100 resolutions that was
made by delegates at your national convention. You voted in support,
but your current leader has yet to take a stance on that.
Mr. Trudeau will have to as a leader, decide the electoral platform.
But he knows that the party supports it. So, of all these
resolutions, which ones will be the mandate of a Trudeau government?
Do you think there should be an age limit on euthanasia?
Oh yes. You need to have a careful regulation like the ones they
have in Quebec and the laws you have in Belgium. You cannot regulate
this issue. You need to help people in awful pain, but at the same
time you need to see that itís done properly. Youíre speaking about
life. Itís a very serious issue.
If elected, will Liberals slap on whatís being called a ďTrudeau
TaxĒ to pay for programs and incentives?
Mr. Trudeau said he will not raise taxes. He said that. The
Conservatives are very good at pretending to write a platform for
ourselves. We will write in our platform that there will not be any
And youíre not going to touch the GST?
No. He (Trudeau) said that. They cut the transfer payments to the
provinces for health. They made a lot of blinded cuts so we
anticipate a surplus.
Should there be a national inquiry into the murdered and missing
Yes, we are requesting that year-after-year. Of course, we should
have one. I donít understand they donít want that one and do the
Given the Snowden revelations about the NSA, do you think the
Canadian government is overstepping the boundaries in spying on
Yes. Before they decided to weaken Statistics Canada, and the
long-form census, in order to protect our privacy, which was a
stupid view, and completely ideological from them. Now, they are
closing their eyes about this issue. What we are asking for is to
have a committee of the House who will look at it as they had
that in the United States and Great Britain and Canada or they will
do it again. So we are committed to do that if we are the
government; we will have MPs on oath who have the responsibility to
watch the watcher. Your MPs will be responsible to ensure that your
privacy is protected.
Some people feel that Justin Trudeau doesnít have the economic
background in order to lead the party. Is there any substance to that?
No. I think Mr. Trudeau, has the right values, the sincerity, the
support of a lot of people in Canada and heís leading a strong team
that have expertise on different files. And heís a good listener.
he will listen to the best experts that he will have around him when
you think of Ralph Goodale, John McCallum, Scott Brison. On military
procurement, a general is coming with us. He knows a lot about this
file while the Conservatives have been so bad to manage the military
Lt. General Andrew Leslie?
Do you think the general abused the Integrated Relocation Fund
when it cost $72,000 to move him 6 blocks?
It shows how nervous the Conservatives are to attack a man who gave
his life for his country like that.
But do you think $72,000 is overcharging?
How many of the other generals did the same? It was part of the
rules that when you give your life for the nation, weíll help you to
move to your new house. He was not involved. He wasnít the one who
decided it will be $72,000, so I think itís a cheap shot from the
conservatives. When they donít know how to answer you about the
substance, they attack your character. They always do that.
The Conservatives leaked that information?
We have no proof of that, but it came as a surprise when we were
having our convention. The minister needs to explain how come a leak
like this came out. They were so willing to attack the general with
a leak. When youíre the Minister of Justice you would ask, how come
a leak came. I would have an inquiry. They wanted to have an inquiry
on the general.
But anyway, Iím very pleased that he is coming because of the procurement
in Canada now. The procurement on all their files is an embarrassment to
the country. Itís hurting the economy and to have men and women in
uniform to have the good equipment, so we need to do a much better
job on this issue.
Mr. Trudeau is trying to find the best experts on every file to
offer Canadians under the strong leadership of his own.
Iím going to help the team as much as I can and Iím glad to be here
today in your beautiful region.
Copyright (c) 2009-2014 The Valley Voice